Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net
Cc: tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log
Date: 2013-01-17 01:35:08
Message-ID: 20130117.103508.1389104581828569673.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>>> This might be way more than we want to do, but there is an article
>>> that describes some techniques for doing what seems to be missing
>>> (AIUI):
>>>
>>> <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163996.aspx>
>> Even this would be doable, I'm afraid it may not fit in 9.3 if we
>> think about the current status of CF. So our choice would be:
>>
>> 1) Postpone the patch to 9.4
>>
>> 2) Commit the patch in 9.3 without Windows support
>>
>> I personally am ok with #2. We traditionally avoid particular paltform
>> specific features on PostgreSQL.  However I think the policiy could be
>> losen for contrib staffs. Also pgbench is just a client program. We
>> could always use pgbench on UNIX/Linux if we truely need the feature.
>>
>> What do you think?
> 
> Fair enough, I was just trying to point out alternatives. We have
> committed platform-specific features before now. I hope it doesn't
> just get left like this, though.

Yeah, I hope someone pick this up and propose as a TODO item. In the
mean time, I'm going to commit the patch without Windows support
unless there's objection.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2013-01-17 01:38:38
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2013-01-17 01:34:41
Subject: Re: CF3+4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group