* Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
> On 1/15/13 2:53 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > You're right, to clarify, for *file_fdw*, which is a backend-only
> > operation, the popen patch is great (thought I made that clear before).
> I would think that if we get writable FDWs, you would want file_fdw to
> go through zlib so that it can write directly to the file.
With the popen patch, I expect it could be defined as '|gzip >
myfile.gz'.. I believe that patch did that. It'd be ideal to add
support for that to file_fdw also, certainly. That shouldn't be hard as
file_fdw is essentially a wrapper around backend COPY already and this
would just be adding a few additional options to pass through.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2013-01-16 20:13:50|
|Subject: Re: CF3+4|
|Previous:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2013-01-16 20:07:14|
|Subject: Re: Parallel query execution|