| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel query execution |
| Date: | 2013-01-16 16:02:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20130116160210.GA26067@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:42:29AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Daniel Farina (daniel(at)heroku(dot)com) wrote:
> > I have been skimming the commitfest application, and unlike some of
> > the previous commitfests a huge number of patches have had review at
> > some point in time, but probably need more...so looking for the red
> > "Nobody" in the 'reviewers' column probably understates the shortage
> > of review.
>
> I've been frustrated by that myself. I realize we don't want to
> duplicate work but I'm really starting to think that having the
> Reviewers column has turned out to actually work against us.
That column tells the CF manager whom to browbeat. Without a CF manager, a
stale entry can indeed make a patch look under-control when it isn't.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-01-16 16:08:31 | Re: Teaching pg_receivexlog to follow timeline switches |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2013-01-16 15:56:14 | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |