On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:20:33PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> What would people think of just eliminating the access-permissions
> checks involved in temp_tablespaces? It would likely be appropriate to
> change temp_tablespaces from USERSET to SUSET if we did so. So
> essentially the worldview would become that the DBA is responsible for
> the temp_tablespaces setting, not individual users.
Allowing that the new behavior could be clearer, that gain is too small to
justify the application compatibility hazard of making temp_tablespaces SUSET.
I don't see something we can do here that clearly improves things overall.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2013-01-10 02:45:36|
|Subject: Re: lazy_vacuum_heap()'s removal of HEAPTUPLE_DEAD tuples|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2013-01-10 02:22:48|
|Subject: Lock levels for ALTER TABLE|