Re: --single-transaction hack to pg_upgrade does not work

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: --single-transaction hack to pg_upgrade does not work
Date: 2012-12-01 17:05:32
Message-ID: 20121201170532.GN27120@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2012-12-01 17:03:03 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Could we possibly allow adding enum values to a type which was just created in
> > this transaction? That shouldn't be too hard. At least easier than providing
> > the capability to pre-assign the next N oids...
>
> The attached patch does just that. Its *not* ready yet though, as it
> will be apparent for everyone who reads it ;)
>
> To really make that work in a reliable manner we would probably need
> an rd_createSubid for typcache entries instead of testing xmin as I have
> done here?

I can confirm that this patch allows pg_upgrade's test.sh to pass. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-12-01 17:06:02 Re: --single-transaction hack to pg_upgrade does not work
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-12-01 17:01:17 Re: --single-transaction hack to pg_upgrade does not work