I'm making some changes to a program that, among other things, reports
tup_fetched/tup_returned as if it were a cache hit rate, analogous to
blks_hit/blks_fetched.
The documentation didn't help me to understand if that was appropriate,
so I looked at the source and asked on IRC. It seems I'm not the first
person to be confused by these descriptions, so here's a tiny patch to
clarify the meaning of fetched and returned.
-- Abhijit
Attachment: tup.diff
Description: text/x-diff (859 bytes)
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Amit Kapila | Date: 2012-10-12 06:34:22 |
| Subject: Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication |
| Previous: | From: Dean Rasheed | Date: 2012-10-12 05:39:49 |
| Subject: Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch] |