Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes
Date: 2012-10-10 15:44:47
Message-ID: 20121010154447.GB9594@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> 2012/9/5 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:

> > Looking at SEPgsql testing is on my long TODO list. I'll have to set up a
> > separate VM for it, as I don't habitually run SELinux.
> >
> If you are available to provide a VM environment for sepgsql, let me help
> set up its build and regression test environment.
>
> As you may know, the regression test of sepgsql requires some additional
> configurations on operating system level, such as security policy load and
> so on. I expect we have to add something special stuff onto the buildfirm
> system.

Did this go anywhere?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2012-10-10 15:47:04 Re: Truncate if exists
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-10-10 15:44:34 Re: BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown