On Mon, Sep  3, 2012 at 12:11:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
> >> 
> >> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
> >> here.
> 
> > We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
> > But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
> > slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
> > going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
> > both on the same bullet point?
> 
> Sure, reword it however you want.  I've not been paying much attention
> to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there.

FYI, I didn't get involved in making the 9.2 major features list because
I felt I already had a heavy hand in creating the original 9.2 release
notes.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. at 2012-09-03 16:11:45 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2012-09-03 16:58:48
	Subject: Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows
Previous:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2012-09-03 16:44:09
	Subject: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2012-09-03 17:53:04
	Subject: pgsql: Fix pg_upgrade to cope with non-default unix_socket_directorysc
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2012-09-03 16:11:45
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.