On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 05:26:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Shouldn't this commit have removed the 1.0 file from git altogether?
> >> It's quite useless if it's not going to get installed.
> 
> > I left it for the possible documentation value thereof.
> 
> We do not keep around dead code in HEAD for historical reference
> purposes.  We have an SCM for that, and we should use it.  The only
> reason to keep this file would be if people were possibly still going to
> install 1.0 in preference to 1.1 ... but this commit eliminated the
> possibility of users doing so.

Would someone please do the above --- I am unclear exactly what files
need to be removed, and any Makefile adjustments.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

• Re: pgsql: Don't install hstore--1.0.sql any more. at 2012-02-26 22:26:03 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: pgsql: Don't install hstore--1.0.sql any more. at 2012-08-28 18:31:26 from Tom Lane

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2012-08-28 02:36:51
	Subject: pgsql: Document how to create advisory lock "bigint" values in SQL.
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2012-08-28 00:54:12
	Subject: pgsql: Improve a couple of 9.2 release note entries.