On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:38:09AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > On 16.08.2012 17:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >>> On 16.08.2012 17:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>>> In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to
> >>>> "unimportant".
> >>> FWIW, I don't think these changes were an improvement. I find
> >>> "not important" more readable in those sentences.
> >> Really? All of them?
> > Yes.. Perhaps "not important" just feels better to me in general
> > than "unimportant".
> Yeah, it's probably subjective, but for me "unimportant" has
> negative, dismissive overtones, while "not important" does not.
> Sort of like the way "unpleasant" has a different meaning than "not
OK, thanks for the feedback.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2012-08-16 15:48:34|
|Subject: The pgrminclude problem|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-08-16 15:44:48|
|Subject: Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the
wrong thing with multixacts|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-08-16 15:56:11|
|Subject: pgsql: Add possible alternate tool for pgrminclude,from Peter Geoghega|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2012-08-16 15:38:09|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: In docs, change a few cases of "not
important" to "unimportant".|