Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Gartner report on Postgresql

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jim(dot)Smith(at)Bull(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Gartner report on Postgresql
Date: 2012-07-27 01:37:26
Message-ID: 20120727013726.GH24238@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:33:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:36:41PM -0700, Jim(dot)Smith(at)Bull(dot)com wrote:
> > 
> >  I have a potential customer that would like to see a Gartner review which
> > includes PostgreSQL.  Has anyone seen something like this?
> 
> No, but you might find this interesting:  ;-)
> 
> 	Why does the IT industry continue to listen to Gartner?
> 	http://www.zdnet.com/why-does-the-it-industry-continue-to-listen-to-gartner-7000001394/

Oh, and if you are interested in Forrester, look at this 2009 Ingres
article summary:  ;-)

	http://info.actian.com/g/?UJR6Q22767=clicksrc:ingres-analyst

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Adrian KlaverDate: 2012-07-27 02:36:38
Subject: Re: Gartner report on Postgresql
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-07-27 01:33:59
Subject: Re: Gartner report on Postgresql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group