Re: binary protocol, again

On Friday 20 July 2012, you wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:09 PM, P. Christeas <xrg(at)linux(dot)gr> wrote:
> >> 3. using PQexecParams instead PQexec
> >
> > Yes, when query is eligible.
>
> Uhm... what is an eligible query?
One that is single (not multi with semicolons), and NOT a "COMMENT" or
"EXECUTE" one.

>
> Are you changing the behaviour of the current cursor class or
> introducing a new one? I'd go most definitely for the second, as I'm
> afraid the first would break a lot of the existing usage.
Introducing a new one "cursor_bin", as we've discussed before.

>
> In particular, what I'd like to see is a protocol ISQLParam, to live
> together with the current ISQLQuote, in order to create a clear
> distinction between the capabilities of the two cursors and avoid
> bloating the current adapters interface.

Hmm. I named it "BSQLQuote", but I guess "ISQLParam is a much better name.
I'll change that.

> As a reference, here is the original message of mine, highlighting
> some of the features we may get by splitting the two protocols:
> <http://archives.postgresql.org/psycopg/2011-02/msg00076.php>.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Daniele

--
Say NO to spam and viruses. Stop using Microsoft Windows!