On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 04:03:40PM -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> In a *very* quick patch I tested using huge pages/MAP_HUGETLB for the mmap'ed
> >> memory.
> >> That gives around 9.5% performance benefit in a read-only pgbench run (-n -S -
> >> j 64 -c 64 -T 10 -M prepared, scale 200, 6GB s_b, 8 cores, 24GB mem).
> >>
> >> It also saves a bunch of memory per process due to the smaller page table
> >> (shared_buffers 6GB):
> >> cat /proc/$pid_of_pg_backend/status |grep VmPTE
> >> VmPTE:      6252 kB
> >> vs
> >> VmPTE:        60 kB
> > ... those results are just spectacular (IMO). nice!
> 
> That is super awesome.  Smallish databases with a high number of
> connections actually spend a considerable fraction of their
> otherwise-available-for-buffer-cache space on page tables in common
> cases currently.

I thought newer Linux kernels did huge pages automatically?  What Linux
kernel is this?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

• Re: Posix Shared Mem patch at 2012-06-29 23:03:40 from Daniel Farina

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2012-07-03 02:52:21
	Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2012-07-03 02:49:10
	Subject: huge tlb support