Re: [PATCH 11/16] Add infrastructure for manipulating multiple streams of wal on a segment handling level

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] Add infrastructure for manipulating multiple streams of wal on a segment handling level
Date: 2012-06-29 13:01:52
Message-ID: 201206291501.53222.andres@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Friday, June 29, 2012 02:43:52 PM Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> trying to review this one according to
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
>
> # Is the patch in context diff format
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff#Context_format>?
> No. (Does this requirement still apply after PostgreSQL switched to GIT?)
Many people seem to send patches in unified format and just some days ago Tom
said it doesn't matter to him. I still can't properly read context diffs, so I
am using unified...

> # Does it apply cleanly to the current git master?
> No. The patches 01...09 in this series taken from the mailing list apply
> cleanly, 10 and 11 fail with rejects.
Yea, and even the patches before that need to be rebased, at least partially
they won't compile even though they apply cleanly.

I will produce a rebased version soon, but then we haven't fully aggreed on
preliminary patches to this one, so there doesn't seem to be too much point in
reviewing this one before the other stuff is clear.

Marking the patch as "Returned with Feedback" for now. I have done the same
with 13, 15. Those seem to be too much in limbo for CF-style reviews.

Thanks!

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2012-06-29 13:11:23 Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-06-29 12:50:58 Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node