Re: Pg default's verbosity?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pg default's verbosity?
Date: 2012-06-29 07:07:03
Message-ID: 20120629070703.GA13903@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:15:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
> > we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though. IME, the following two
> > messages account for a huge percentage of the chatter:
>
> > NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "foo_a_seq" for
> > serial column "foo.a"
> > NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
> > "foo_pkey" for table "foo"
>
> Personally, I'd have no problem with flat-out dropping (not demoting)
> both of those two specific messages. I seem to recall that Bruce has
> lobbied for them heavily in the past, though.

I would like to see them gone or reduced as well. I think I wanted them
when we changed the fact that SERIAL doesn't create unique indexes, but
that was long ago --- I think everyone knows what happens now.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-06-29 07:10:37 Re: Checkpointer on hot standby runs without looking checkpoint_segments
Previous Message Csaba Nagy 2012-06-29 06:10:03 Re: Covering Indexes