On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 10:37:58AM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> I could try to clean up and post the patch that implements this if you want.
> The second method was just to do --enable-profiling on a stock build
> and look at the call graph section of gprof output. It attributed 50%
> to pg_plan_queries and children and about 10% to each of
> pg_parse_query and pg_analyze_and_rewrite (including their respective
> children). I don't put tremendous faith in gprof's call graph, but
> the fact that the results are in agreement with the other method gives
> me more confidence in both.
Those are the ratio's I (and I think Tom) expected to see.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-05-02 18:17:38|
|Subject: Beta time?|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-05-02 18:14:31|
|Subject: Re: online debloatification (was: extending relations more efficiently)|