On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:55:15PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> Concerning everyone's favorite topic, how to name the new type of table, I
> liked Tom's proposal to make CREATE TEMP TABLE retain current behavior and
> have CREATE GLOBAL TEMP TABLE and/or CREATE LOCAL TEMP TABLE request the new
> SQL-standard variety. (I'd vote for using CREATE GLOBAL and retaining CREATE
> LOCAL for future expansion.) As he mentions, to get there, we'd ideally start
> by producing a warning instead of silently accepting GLOBAL as a noise word.
> Should we put such a warning into 9.2?
Here is the change I'd make.
>  http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/5422(dot)1240936705(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2012-04-29 20:04:50|
|Subject: Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-04-29 19:43:19|
|Subject: Re: default_transaction_isolation = serializable causes
crash under Hot Standby|