On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:55:15PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> Concerning everyone's favorite topic, how to name the new type of table, I
> liked Tom's proposal[1] to make CREATE TEMP TABLE retain current behavior and
> have CREATE GLOBAL TEMP TABLE and/or CREATE LOCAL TEMP TABLE request the new
> SQL-standard variety.  (I'd vote for using CREATE GLOBAL and retaining CREATE
> LOCAL for future expansion.)  As he mentions, to get there, we'd ideally start
> by producing a warning instead of silently accepting GLOBAL as a noise word.
> Should we put such a warning into 9.2?

Here is the change I'd make.

Thanks,
nm

> [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/5422(dot)1240936705(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us

In response to

• Temporary tables under hot standby at 2012-04-25 03:55:15 from Noah Misch

Responses

• Re: Temporary tables under hot standby at 2012-06-08 17:26:20 from Robert Haas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2012-04-29 20:04:50
	Subject: Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2012-04-29 19:43:19
	Subject: Re: default_transaction_isolation = serializable causes crash under Hot Standby