On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 02:18:02AM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:04:26AM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> >> 1) pgstattuple-gin_spgist.patch
> >> This first patch adds gin and spgist support to pgstattuple, also
> >> makes pgstattuple use a ring buffer when reading tables or indexes.
> > The buffer access strategy usage bits look fine to commit.
> ok. i extracted that part. which basically makes pgstattuple usable in
> production (i mean, by not bloating shared buffers when using the
I created a CF entry for this and marked it Ready for Committer. You left the
bstrategy variable non-static, but that didn't seem important enough to
justify another round trip.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-03-13 02:50:36|
|Subject: SPGiST versus hot standby - question about conflict resolution rules|
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2012-03-13 02:34:10|
|Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic|