On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:05:10AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> What is weird to me is the "COMMAND" column as far as these four processes
> >> are concerned.
> >> In the "COMMAND "column I would expect a real command, not a description.
> >> Can you explain?
> We intentionally change the command string reported by ps for each
> postmaster child process, so that you can tell the various processes
> apart. If we did not, every postmaster child would show the exact
> same command string as the postmaster itself was launched with.
> (To get an idea of how useless that is, try looking at "top" sometime
> --- on most systems I've worked with, it ignores the changed command
> strings, so you can't tell what's what.)
I belive the 'c' command in modern versions of top toggles display of
the current command string.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-novice by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-02-14 21:23:39|
|Subject: Re: Using libpq 8.4 with PostgreSQL 9.1|
|Previous:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2012-02-14 14:43:48|
|Subject: Re: insert fail gracefully if primary key already exists|