Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Planet posting policy

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Date: 2012-02-01 23:29:58
Message-ID: 20120201232958.GA15418@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:15:39PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
> On 02/01/2012 02:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> >If I was sure that commercial content would be posted with the same
> >regularity and motivation as our current content, I would be fine, but
> >knowing companies, I doubt that is true.
> >
> >I can imagine company X saying, "Oh, we have a new product coming out
> >--- we need a blog campaign around that."  I am afraid that isn't going
> >to be pretty.
> 
> I would agree with that and I am not suggesting we allow press
> releases or advertising etc... However, I do think relevant
> technical information on a product is useful.

Well, as you can see, I am arguing both points, so I am more shooting
out possible ideas rather than having a clear goal myself.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2012-02-01 23:41:15
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2012-02-01 22:15:39
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group