At 2012-01-31 12:04:31 -0500, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> That fails to answer the question of what we ought to do if we get an
> invalid sequence there.
I think it's best to categorically reject invalid surrogates as early as
possible, considering the number of bugs that are related to them (not
in Postgres, just in general). I can't see anything good coming from
letting them in and leaving them to surprise someone in future.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2012-01-31 18:32:31|
|Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2012-01-31 18:17:25|
|Subject: no error context for index updates?|