Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Simulating Clog Contention

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simulating Clog Contention
Date: 2012-01-26 14:18:15
Message-ID: 20120126141815.GB30769@toroid.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 2012-01-12 12:31:20 +0000, simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com wrote:
>
> The following patch adds a pgbench option -I to load data using
> INSERTs

This is just to confirm that the patch applies and builds and works
fine (though of course it does take a long time… pity there doesn't
seem to be any easy way to add progress indication like -i has).

I'm aware of the subsequent discussion about using only a long option,
documenting -n, and adding a knob to control index creation timing. I
don't have a useful opinion on any of those things. It's just that the
patch was marked "Needs review" and it was only while waiting for 100k
inserts to run that I thought of checking if there was any discussion
about it. Oops.

> Yes, my laptop really is that slow.

It appears to be eight times as fast as mine.

-- ams

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-01-26 14:40:06
Subject: Re: [v9.2] sepgsql's DROP Permission checks
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-01-26 14:14:42
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parameterized inner paths

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group