Hi,
Hm. I just noticed a relatively big hole in the patch: The handling of
deletion of dependent objects currently is nonexistant because they don't go
through ProcessUtility...
Currently thinking what the best way to nicely implement that is. For other
commands the original command string is passed - that obviously won't work for
that case...
Andres
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Kevin Grittner | Date: 2011-12-02 21:11:04 |
| Subject: Re: FlexLocks |
| Previous: | From: Heikki Linnakangas | Date: 2011-12-02 20:51:42 |
| Subject: Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables |