> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:42 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
> <yamt(at)mwd(dot)biglobe(dot)ne(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>> 5. Make the WAL writer more responsive, maybe using latches, so that
>>>>> it doesn't take as long for the commit record to make it out to disk.
>>>> I'm working on this already as part of the update for power
>>>> reduction/group commit/replication performance.
>>> I extracted this from my current patch for you to test.
>> is it expected to produce more frequent fsync?
> Yes, I would expect that. What kind of increase are you seeing? Is
> it causing a problem for you, or are you just making an observation?
i was curious because my application uses async commits mainly to
avoid frequent fsync. i have no numbers right now.
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2011-11-30 08:02:51|
|Subject: Re: Word-smithing doc changes|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-11-30 06:05:14|
|Subject: Re: Patch - Debug builds without optimization |