On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:04:23PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm. Shouldn't we make the autovac launcher use READ COMMITTED, too?
Yeah, probably. That one doesn't seem so important because its
transactions aren't long-running (IIRC, it only starts a transaction to
scan pg_database). But it wouldn't hurt to keep it from pointlessly
registering a serializable transaction.
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Daniel Farina||Date: 2011-11-30 02:10:48|
|Subject: backup_label during crash recovery: do we know how to solve it?|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2011-11-30 00:33:48|
|Subject: Re: autovacuum and default_transaction_isolation|