Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 24.11.2011 07:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> OK, that is a heap table. My only guess is that the heap is being
> > >> created without binary_upgrade_next_heap_pg_class_oid being set.
> > >> Looking at the code, I can't see how the heap could be created without
> > >> this happening. Another idea is that pg_dumpall isn't output the proper
> > >> value, but again, how is this data type different from the others.
> > >
> > > I have reproduced the failure and found it was code I added to pg_dump
> > > back in 9.0. The code didn't set the index oid for exclusion constraint
> > > indexes. Once these were added to the regression tests for range types
> > > recently, pg_upgrade threw an error.
> > >
> > > My assumption is that anyone trying to use an exclusion constraint with
> > > pg_upgrade will get the same type of error.
> > >
> > > Patch attached. Should it be backpatched to 9.0 and 9.1?
> > If I understood correctly, pg_upgrade of a database with exclusion
> > constraints won't work without this patch? In that case, it should be
> > backpatched.
> Yes, that is my guess. I will test it today or tomorrow. I am
> surprised we had _no_ exclusion constraint tests in the regression tests
> until now.
I do see EXCLUDE constraints in 9.0, so I need to do some more research:
CREATE TABLE circles (
EXCLUDE USING gist
(c1 WITH &&, (c2::circle) WITH &&)
WHERE (circle_center(c1) <> '(0,0)')
It seems it is only the range-type EXCLUDE constraints that are causing
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-11-24 15:54:50|
|Subject: Re: RangeVarGetRelid()|
|Previous:||From: Alexander Shulgin||Date: 2011-11-24 15:22:06|
|Subject: Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq|