| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Mark <Marek(dot)Balgar(at)seznam(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: ts_rank |
| Date: | 2011-10-12 21:31:35 |
| Message-ID: | 201110122131.p9CLVZo12669@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Mark wrote:
> > >There's some potentially useful information here:
> > >http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/textsearch-controls.html#TEXTSEARCH-RANKING
> >
> > Thanks for reply. I was reading the documentation of PostgreSQL, but there
> > it is not written the name of the used methods. Everywhere there is written,
> > that ts_rank use standard ranking function. But it is difficult to say which
> > is the standard function.
> > Somewhere I found that it is maybe based on Vector space model and it seems
> > to be truth, because in the code of tsrank.c is counted the frequency of
> > words, but I am not sure of that :-(
>
> Oleg, Teodor, can you give me a description of how ts_rank decided how
> to rank items? Thanks.
Any news on this question?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2011-10-12 21:33:30 | Re: pl/perl example in the doc no longer works in 9.1 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-10-12 21:22:59 | Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation |