Re: Change to documentation headers

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Chris Meller <chris(at)doesnthaveone(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Change to documentation headers
Date: 2011-10-11 02:08:35
Message-ID: 201110110208.p9B28Zm23632@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-www

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > More thinking --- "PostgreSQL 9.0.3 Documentation" at the top center is
> > already clickable, so that can act as the home. Let's duplicate that at
> > the bottom too.
>
> OK, so here is a summary:
>
> o remove fast forward/backward links
> o add book title where there is no heading
> o make book and chapter titles as links
> o make the bottom footer match the top header
>
> Can we backpatch this to 8.2 so all our online documentation has it?

I have developed the attached patch which implements an "Up/Home" link
at the top of the page in place of the "Fast Backward" link, and removes
the "Fast Forward" link. It says "Up", unless you are already at the
book title, in which case it says "Home".

While this isn't ideal, it is probably good enough to make things easier
for users. This might be nice to backpatch so all our docs have the
same navigation links.

You can view the built docs here:

http://momjian.us/expire/pgsql/index.html

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/sgml text/x-diff 2.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-11 14:44:34 Re: Discrepancy in 9.1 Documentation on CREATE ROLE
Previous Message Ron Adams 2011-10-10 17:55:39 Re: Discrepancy in 9.1 Documentation on CREATE ROLE

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Great SunWuKung 2011-10-12 02:18:05 Re: 7
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-10-10 21:17:38 Re: One click installer a bit bare?