Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Problem with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problem with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1
Date: 2011-10-06 20:43:46
Message-ID: 201110062043.p96KhkP27296@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Bruce Momjian, 06.10.2011 02:15:
> >> I now got the same error (alas with a different relation id) while
> >> migrating a completely different data directory.
> >>
> >> Anything I can do to help find the reason for this problem (or bug?)
> >>
> >> Unfortuantely the data contains some confidential information so I
> >> cannot make it available.
> >
> > This bug was fixed just after 9.1.1 was released.  The bug is that
> > Windows doesn't properly pass the right flags for the oid set functions
> > to operate.  If you can compile the git 9.1.X current, the fix is in
> > there;  the fix will be in 9.1.2.
> >
> 
> Thanks for the feedback.
> As those were only development databases, it was no big deal to do the migration "the old way" ;)
> 
> Again I'm impressed by the speed how things are fixed in Postgres!

Actually, this was one of our slow ones.  :-)

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Dickson S. GuedesDate: 2011-10-06 20:50:20
Subject: Re: Tuning Variables For PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Adam CornettDate: 2011-10-06 20:07:08
Subject: Re: Connection Pooling

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group