Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
Date: 2011-09-30 02:24:43
Message-ID: 20110930.112443.111535170.horiguchi.kyotaro@oss.ntt.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello,

I understand that it has been at least practically no problem.

Ok, I send this patch to comitters.

Thanks for your dealing with nuisance questions.


At Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:21:32 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAHGQGwG0C21F0CZY5ExX-49dxdx7hJuNeiBBJ0Tzvh+7vMXWgw(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> >> > Nevertheless this is ok for all OSs, I don't know whether
> >> > initializing TimestampTz(double, int64 is ok) field with 8 bytes
...
> I believe it's safe. Such a code is placed elsewhere in the source, too.
> If it's unsafe, we should have received lots of bug reports related
> to that. But we've not.

Regards,

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2011-09-30 06:57:02
Subject: Re: bug of recovery?
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2011-09-30 01:09:07
Subject: Re: bug of recovery?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group