Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_upgrade - add config directory setting

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, "Mr(dot) Aaron W(dot) Swenson" <titanofold(at)gentoo(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade - add config directory setting
Date: 2011-09-29 23:27:35
Message-ID: 201109292327.p8TNRZm03255@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Yeah.  I think the only sensible way to do this would be to provide an
> >> operating mode for the postgres executable that would just parse the
> >> config file and spit out requested values.
> 
> > That would certainly solve the problem, though it would have to be
> > backpatched all the way back to 8.4, and it would require pg_upgrade
> > users to be on newer minor versions of Postgres.
> 
> I would just say "no" to people who expect this to work against older
> versions of Postgres.  I think it's sufficient if we get this into HEAD
> so that it will work in the future.

Well, it is going to work in the future only when the _old_ version is
9.2+.  Specifically, pg_upgrade using the flag could be patched to just
9.2, but the flag has to be supported on old and new backends for that
to work.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: AlexanderDate: 2011-09-30 00:54:22
Subject: Re: REVIEW proposal: a validator for configuration files
Previous:From: Michael PaquierDate: 2011-09-29 23:27:08
Subject: Re: pg_regress input/output directory option

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group