Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: superusers are members of all roles?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Date: 2011-09-12 09:55:42
Message-ID: 20110912095542.GR12765@tamriel.snowman.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
> It's NOT changing that. All this affects is how +groupname is
> treated in pg_hba.conf, i.e. do we treat every superuser there as
> being a member of every group.

Ah, sorry for the noise, that's fine (and I'm bit suprised it was a
one-liner, guess I should go look at the patch... ;).

	Thanks,

		Stephen

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Etsuro FujitaDate: 2011-09-12 10:40:11
Subject: WIP: Collecting statistics on CSV file data
Previous:From: Kohei KaiGaiDate: 2011-09-12 09:45:04
Subject: [v9.2] "database" object class of contrib/sepgsql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group