* Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
> It's NOT changing that. All this affects is how +groupname is
> treated in pg_hba.conf, i.e. do we treat every superuser there as
> being a member of every group.
Ah, sorry for the noise, that's fine (and I'm bit suprised it was a
one-liner, guess I should go look at the patch... ;).
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Etsuro Fujita||Date: 2011-09-12 10:40:11|
|Subject: WIP: Collecting statistics on CSV file data|
|Previous:||From: Kohei KaiGai||Date: 2011-09-12 09:45:04|
|Subject: [v9.2] "database" object class of contrib/sepgsql|