Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: superusers are members of all roles?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Date: 2011-09-12 02:32:07
Message-ID: 20110912023207.GQ12765@tamriel.snowman.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
> >	Address problem where superusers are assumed to be members of all groups
> >	
> >	    http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00337.php
> 
> This turns out to be a one-liner.

I really don't know that I agree with removing this, to be honest..  I
haven't got time at the moment to really discuss it, but at the very
least, not being able to 'set role' to any user when postgres would be
REALLY annoying..

	Thanks,

		Stephen

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Amit KapilaDate: 2011-09-12 03:08:25
Subject: Re: cheaper snapshots redux
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-09-12 01:40:13
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group