Re: superusers are members of all roles?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Date: 2011-09-10 03:34:45
Message-ID: 201109100334.p8A3YjN21452@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Is this a TODO?
>
> I think so.

Added to TODO:

Address problem where superusers are assumed to be members of all groups

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00337.php

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-09-10 05:08:05 new createuser option for replication role
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-09-10 03:28:16 Re: Large C files