Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: superusers are members of all roles?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Date: 2011-09-10 03:34:45
Message-ID: 201109100334.p8A3YjN21452@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Is this a TODO?
> 
> I think so.

Added to TODO:

	Address problem where superusers are assumed to be members of all groups
	
	    http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00337.php 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2011-09-10 05:08:05
Subject: new createuser option for replication role
Previous:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2011-09-10 03:28:16
Subject: Re: Large C files

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group