Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >>> Please lets not waste effort on refactoring efforts in mid dev cycle.
> >> Say what? When else would you have us do it?
> > When else would you have us develop?
> In my eyes that sort of activity *is* development. I find the
> distinction you are drawing entirely artificial, and more calculated to
> make sure refactoring never happens than to add any safety. Any
> significant development change carries a risk of breakage.
I ran pgrminclude a week ago and that is certainly a larger change than
this. Early in the development cycle people are merging in their saved
patches, so now is a fine time to do refactoring.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-09-08 14:43:38|
|Subject: Re: Large C files|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-09-08 14:28:43|
|Subject: Re: concurrent snapshots|