Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This comment seems inaccurate and bizarrely placed.  What question
> >> were you trying to answer?
> 
> > It was in response to my email where I asked why we are sending cache
> > invalidation messages for temporary tables that can't be seen by any
> > other backends:
> > 	http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg00844.php
> 
> Oh.  OK, I cleaned it up a bit.

Thanks.  Good to have it documented.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

• Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for at 2011-09-06 21:07:56 from Tom Lane

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2011-09-06 21:32:56
	Subject: pgsql: Add documentation suggestion about adding a comment to the topo
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2011-09-06 21:07:56
	Subject: Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for