Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for
> > session-local objects.
> This comment seems inaccurate and bizarrely placed. What question
> were you trying to answer?
It was in response to my email where I asked why we are sending cache
invalidation messages for temporary tables that can't be seen by any
i.e. why are we generating unnecessary invalidation traffic. Is there a
better place for the comment?
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-09-06 21:07:13|
|Subject: pgsql: Improve comment about handling of temp tables in shared-invalco|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2011-09-06 20:07:00|
|Subject: pgsql: Correct ancient logic mistake in assertion|