Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail
Date: 2011-09-06 15:49:48
Message-ID: 201109061549.p86Fnmt15259@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It's not just the port, it's all the connection parameters ---
> >> do_connect relies on the PGconn object to remember those, and in this
> >> case there no longer is a PGconn object.
> >>
> >> We could have psql keep that information separately, but I'm not sure
> >> it's really worth the trouble.
>
> > well, I think it's definitely worth the trouble.
>
> [ shrug.. ] So submit a patch. Personally I don't think the case comes
> up often enough to be worth the trouble, and I'd much rather spend
> development time on preventing the server from crashing in the first
> place.

Should we document this somewhere?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-09-06 16:26:47 Re: BUG #6199: Can't install datatype hstore
Previous Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2011-09-06 15:38:29 Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail