Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem
Date: 2011-09-05 15:56:34
Message-ID: 201109051556.p85FuY005837@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 08:05:51AM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:54:20PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Working with depesz, I have found the cause.  The code I added to fix
> > > pg_upgrade in 9.0.4 and earlier releases didn't handle old 8.3 servers
> > > properly.  I mistakenly processed toast table with the same pg_dump
> > > query as used for pre-8.4 toast tables, not realizing those were not
> > > functional because there were no reloptions for toast tables in pre-8.4.
> > 
> > Thanks a lot. Will test and post results (around sunday/monday I guess).
> 
> All worked.
> pg_upgrade/vacuum didn't raise any errors. Will check some random
> queries too, but don't expect anything to break.

Thanks.  I will announce the known bug and the fix.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-09-05 15:59:22
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clean up the #include mess a little.
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-09-05 15:56:03
Subject: Re: 'literal' for numbers

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-09-05 16:30:42
Subject: Re: SSL certificates issue
Previous:From: hubert depesz lubaczewskiDate: 2011-09-05 15:48:50
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group