Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
Date: 2011-07-12 14:13:42
Message-ID: 201107121413.p6CEDgI03933@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mar jul 12 09:34:56 -0400 2011:
> 
> > > Agreed. On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other
> > > having "Sponsored by RedHat" on every Tom Lane item will get tiring.
> > > ;-)
> > >
> > > Can we add text if the employer is _not_ the feature sponsor?
> > 
> > That would be quite unfair to those who *do* employ committers....
> > Basically you'd get credit only if you didn't employ a committer.
> 
> Well, that has worked well for my case -- I haven't ever credited my
> employer, only those that have specifically hired us for a particular
> patch.  My employer gets a lot of "credit" in the form of email
> signatures, like the one below ;-)
> 
> But I see your point and I will stick to whatever policy we come up with
> (assuming we come up with one).
> 
> > This all becomes much easier if we keep the ads out of the commit
> > messages, and stick to the technical side there. And find another
> > venue for the other credit.
> 
> I'm open to ideas.

Agreed.  I am not firm either way on the issue;  I was just throwing out
a suggestion.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-07-12 14:20:59
Subject: Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-07-12 13:56:30
Subject: Re: per-column generic option

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-07-12 14:29:40
Subject: pgsql: perltidy run over msvc build system
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-07-12 13:54:34
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group