| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432 |
| Date: | 2011-06-27 18:19:26 |
| Message-ID: | 201106271819.p5RIJQY09530@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> > OK, fair enough. ?Should I apply my ports patch to Postgres 9.2?
> >>
> >> I'm not sure which patch you are referring to.
> >
> > This one which makes 50432 the default port.
>
> There appear to be some other changes mixed into this patch.
The additional changes were to have the existing environment variables
begin with "PG", as requested.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-06-27 18:23:58 | SSI modularity questions |
| Previous Message | Darren Duncan | 2011-06-27 18:15:13 | Re: Range Types, constructors, and the type system |