Re: switch UNLOGGED to LOGGED

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: switch UNLOGGED to LOGGED
Date: 2011-05-29 08:29:38
Message-ID: 20110529082938.GA13718@tornado.gateway.2wire.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 09:33:09PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> >> So, it's ok to have a log item that is replayed only if
> >>
> >> WalRcvInProgress()
> >>
> >> is true?
> >
> > No, that checks for WAL streaming in particular. ?A log-shipping standby needs
> > the same treatment.
> >
> >> Is it a correct approach? I couldn't find any other way to
> >> find out if we are in a standby or a master...
> >
> > InArchiveRecovery looks like the right thing, but it's currently static to
> > xlog.c. ?Perhaps exporting that is the way to go.
>
> Why is it necessary to replay the operation only on the slave? Can we
> just use XLOG_HEAP_NEWPAGE?

I don't think it is *necessary*. If we're replaying WAL on a master, we'll also
be resetting unlogged relations after recovery; what we write or do not write to
them in the mean time has no functional impact. Seemed like a sensible
optimization, but maybe it's premature.

nm

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2011-05-29 08:40:28 Re: [ADMIN] pg_class reltuples/relpages not updated by autovacuum/vacuum
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-29 05:23:26 Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project