Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Failed pgbench: setrandom invalid maximum number 0

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Failed pgbench: setrandom invalid maximum number 0
Date: 2011-05-29 04:20:27
Message-ID: 20110529042027.GB13070@core.home (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
> That's not valid syntax.  Some versions of getopt() take it upon
> themselves to rearrange the switch order, some do not ...

Sorry: I should have made clear this happens without the -n as well, 
I just wanted to make the sample output a little smaller.

-- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)endpoint(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: EmanuelDate: 2011-05-29 11:16:30
Subject: BUG #6045: Compilation of contribs fail
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-05-29 03:55:01
Subject: Re: Failed pgbench: setrandom invalid maximum number 0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group