Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:30:40PM +0000, Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA) wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-
> > owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Kevin Grittner
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:27 PM
> > To: Jaime Casanova; David Fetter
> > Cc: Josh Berkus; Joshua Kramer; Ian Bailey-Leung; PostgreSQL Advocacy
> > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Unlogged vs. In-Memory
> >
> > Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > > David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > >> +1 for Fast Tables.
> > >
> > > so, if i want my database to be fast i have to use those? that
> > > name is pretty misleading.
> >
> > If we're talking about marketing jargon, how about getting *really*
> > out there with "lightening tables". Built for speed but not
> > persistence.
>
> What about something like "Write Accelerated Tables"?
>
> Brad.

-1. Way too long.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate