On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:54:31AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Even though this didn't show any difference in Dan's performance
> tests, it seems like reasonable insurance against creating a new
> bottleneck in very high concurrency situations.
>  
> Dan, do you have a patch for this, or should I create one?

Sure, patch is attached.

Dan

-- 
Dan R. K. Ports              MIT CSAIL                http://drkp.net/

In response to

• Re: SSI non-serializalbe UPDATE performance (was: getting to beta) at 2011-04-23 13:54:31 from Kevin Grittner

Responses

• Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance at 2011-04-25 13:52:53 from Robert Haas
• Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance at 2011-04-27 17:26:52 from Simon Riggs

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2011-04-25 07:14:16
	Subject: Re: Unlogged tables, persistent kind
Previous:	From: Daniel Farina	Date: 2011-04-25 02:06:06
	Subject: Re: fsync reliability