Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Major features for 9.1

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Major features for 9.1
Date: 2011-04-07 00:41:35
Message-ID: 20110407004135.GB9129@fetter.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 12:38:02PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On lör, 2011-04-02 at 15:32 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >  Or does someone else have wCTEs?  I vaguely remember something
> >  about SQL Server ...
> 
> Since they're in the SQL:2011 standards draft, they must have been
> implemented somewhere before.

What's in the SQL:2011 standards draft is a long way behind even our
current wCTE implementation[1], and it corresponds to something in DB2.

Cheers,
David.

[1] I have Evil Plans™ for further expansion.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2011-04-07 00:42:43
Subject: Re: Major features for 9.1
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2011-04-07 00:39:33
Subject: Re: Major features for 9.1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group