On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:11:49AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I think this is a manifestation the same problem mentioned here:
> >> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=31b6fc06d83c6de3644c8f2921eb7de0eb92fac3
> >> I believe this requires some refactoring to fix. ?It would be good to do that.
> > The best way I can see is to make ATExecAddColumn more like ATExecDropColumn,
> > ATAddCheckConstraint, and ATExecDropConstraint. ?Namely, recurse at Exec-time
> > rather than Prep-time, and cease recursing when we satisfy the ADD COLUMN with a
> > merge. ?Did you have something else in mind?
> I had exactly what you just said in mind.
Patch attached, then.
> > Incidentally, when we satisfy an ADD COLUMN with a merge, we do not check or
> > update attnotnull:
<details ... what should we do?>
> Not sure. I think that anything we do here is bound to have some
> corner cases that are not quite right for so long as NOT NULL
> constraints aren't represented in pg_constraint, and it's way too late
> to dredge up that issue again for 9.1. I'm somewhat inclined to just
> defer fixing it until we get that work committed.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Brendan Jurd||Date: 2011-04-01 05:51:54|
|Subject: Re: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific|
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2011-04-01 03:12:27|
|Subject: Re: corner case about replication and shutdown|
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: John R Pierce||Date: 2011-04-01 08:17:57|
|Subject: Re: default password for user postgres|
|Previous:||From: Craig Ringer||Date: 2011-04-01 03:49:20|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5939: About bytea|