| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade? |
| Date: | 2011-03-31 16:11:33 |
| Message-ID: | 201103311611.p2VGBX314788@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> ?I think the maintenance
> >> overhead of an invisible variable is too much.
> >
> > A simple GUC or command-line switch isn't much code.
>
> I like the idea of a command-line switch.
If you want to do that you should gereralize it as --binary-upgrade in
case we have other needs for it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-03-31 16:11:59 | Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-31 16:08:34 | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade? |