Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?
Date: 2011-03-30 19:39:05
Message-ID: 201103301939.p2UJd5403598@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2011-03-30 at 10:57 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Also, I am unclear if this is really our bug.  At least one of the
> > systems was on Ubuntu/Debian, and they might both have been, and I know
> > Debian changes our source code.  Where can I find a copy of the diffs
> > they have made?
> 
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~pitti/postgresql/debian-9.0/files/head:/debian/patches/

These all seem reasonable, but I am confused by this.  Someone reported
last week that the equals sign is not optional in postgreql.conf on
Debian but I don't see that patch in here.  Also I thought they modified
pg_hba.conf in some odd way.  Are these changes no longer made in 9.0?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-03-30 19:42:19
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and PGCLIENTENCODING
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2011-03-30 19:35:42
Subject: Re: Process local hint bit cache

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group