Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Document that the parenthesized VACUUM syntax is deprecated, not the
> > FREEZE functionality.
> 
> The text you added here is flat-out wrong (you used "unparenthesized"
> in both halves of the sentence), and it's also not as clear as the
> text it replaced.  I'd suggest reverting this, and instead adding a
> sentence that says simply:
> 
> The unparenthesized syntax is deprecated.

Fixed.  Other changes?  I didn't like the original sentence because it
started by mentioning 9.0 rather than the syntax itself.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document that the parenthesized VACUUM syntax is deprecated, not at 2011-03-11 12:56:11 from Robert Haas

Responses

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document that the parenthesized VACUUM syntax is deprecated, not at 2011-03-11 13:03:54 from Robert Haas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2011-03-11 13:02:25
	Subject: Re: Sync Rep v19
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2011-03-11 12:56:11
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document that the parenthesized VACUUM syntax is deprecated, not

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2011-03-11 13:03:54
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document that the parenthesized VACUUM syntax is deprecated, not
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2011-03-11 12:58:04
	Subject: pgsql: Fix "unparenthesized" mention in vacuum docs.